1. Ramming, ‘Internationalprivatrechtliche Fragen der Multimodal-Beförderung’, TranspR ۲۰۰۷,

1. Rennert, 2005 ‘Is elimination of forum shopping by means of international uniform law an ‘impossible mission’?’, MqJBL ۲۰۰۵,

1. Sadat-Akhavi, Methods of resolving conflicts between treaties, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003,

1. Sarcevic & P. Volken 1986 , International Sale of Goods: Dubrovnik Lectures, Oceana www.cisg.law.pace.edu,

1. Schommer, International Multimodal Transport ▪ Some thoughts with regard to the “Scope of application”, “Liability of carrier” and “Other conventions” in the UNICITRAL Draft Instrument on the Carriage of Goods , 2005, http://lawspace.law.uct.ac.za,

1. Schommer, International Multimodal Transport ▪ Some thoughts with regard to the “Scope of application”, “Liability of carrier” and “Other conventions” in the UNICITRAL Draft Instrument on the Carriage of Goods , 2005, http://lawspace.law.uct.ac.za,

1. Sinclair, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’, ۱۹۹۵,

1. Smeele, Passieve legitimatie uit cognossement (diss. Rotterdam), Rotterdam 1998.

1. Streng, 2005 ‘De grenzen van de partij-autonomie in het internationaal contractenrecht’, NTHR

1. van Beelen, 1996, Multimodaal vervoer, Het kameleonsysteem van Boek 8 BW (diss. Leiden), Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink 1996,

1. van den Bergh & L.T. Visscher, 2006 ‘Economische baten en kosten van eenvormig bedrijfsrecht’, in: F. De Ly, K.F. Haak & W.H. van Boom (eds.), Eenvormig bedrijfsrecht: realiteit of utopie?, Boom Juridische Uitgevers: Den Haag 2006,

1. van der Velde, ‘Rome I’, in: F.G.M. Smeele (ed.), Conflictenrecht in ontwikkeling, Zutphen: Paris

1. Vierdag 1995, Het Nederlandse verdragenrecht, Studiepocket staats- en bestuursrecht 27, Zwolle

1. Wagner, 2009 ‘Normenkonflikte zwischen den EG-Verordnungen und transportrechtlichen Rechtsinstrumenten’, TranspR

Wagner, 2009 ‘Normenkonflikte zwischen den EG-Verordnungen und transportrechtlichen Rechtsinstrumenten’, TranspR

1. – A. van Beelen, 1996, Multimodaal vervoer, Het kameleonsysteem van Boek 8 BW (diss. Leiden), Zwolle: Tjeenk Willink 1996, p. 48. ↑

1. – به زبان فرانسه Connaissement de Transport Combine. به زبان انگلیسی Combined Transport bill of lading ↑

1. – به زبان انگلیسی Multimodal Transport Operator(M.T.O). به زبان فرانسه Enterpreneur du Transport Combine ↑

1. – M. Bruins-Slot, 2006, De overeenkomst van goederenvervoer per spoor, Zutphen: Paris 2006, p. 20. ↑

1. – Article 2 COTIF-CIM, Article 27(2) CMNI, Article 9 HVR, Article 25(3) Hamburg Rules, Article 86 RR. ↑

1. – Conclusion by AG Mok concerning HR 10 November 1989, NJ 1991, 248; RvdW 1989, 254; Conclusion by AG Strikwerda concerning HR 30 March 1990, NJ 1991, 249; Report on the fifty-fourth session of the UN’s International Law Commission in 2002, Supplement No. 10 (A/57/10) to the 57th session, p. 240. ↑

1. – این قاعده ممکن است درمورد مادۀ ۲۵ مقررات رتردام ۱ و یا مادۀ ۲۵ از قسمت ۳٫۳٫۲ بخش ۳ مقررات رم ۱ به کار گرفته شود. ↑

1. – Sinclair, ‘Problems Arising from a Succession of Codification Conventions on a Particular Subject’, ۱۹۹۵, www.idi-iil.org., p. 3. ↑

1. – T. Schommer, International Multimodal Transport ▪ Some thoughts with regard to the “Scope of application”, “Liability of carrier” and “Other conventions” in the UNICITRAL Draft Instrument on the Carriage of Goods , 2005, http://lawspace.law.uct.ac.za, p. 30-31. ↑

1. – برای مشاهدۀ نظریۀ مخالف ر.ش به:J. Kropholler,1975, Internationales Einheitsrecht, Tübingen: Mohr 1975, p. 237. ↑

1. – Article 53 VC reads: “A treaty is void if, at the time of its conclusion, it conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. For the purposes of the present Convention, a peremptory norm of general international law is a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted and which can be modified only by a subsequent norm of general international law having the same character.” Article 64 VC reads: “If a new peremptory norm of general international law emerges, any existing treaty which is in conflict with that norm becomes void and terminates.” ↑

1. – S.A. Sadat-Akhavi, 2003, Methods of resolving conflicts between treaties, Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers 2003, p. 49 and 54 ↑

1. – Report of the Study Group of the International Law Commission, 58th session 2006, A/CN.4/L.682, p. 116. S. Rogov, 2005 ‘Neuauslegung des Art. 1 Abs. 5 CMR?’, TranspR ۲۰۰۵,, p. 187. ↑